6/21/2023 0 Comments Polyether impression material© 2020 by the American College of Prosthodontists. All impression materials demonstrated acceptable surface detail reproduction with no significant differences between them.ĭimensional accuracy polyether vinyl polyether silicone vinyl polysiloxane. Storage space available Rate of use Shelf life of the material. The Impregum Penta Soft polyether impression material product range launched in 2000 was designed to facilitate impression removal, even in difficult clinical settings such as severe under-cuts, and provided fresh tasting peppermint flavorings. Which of the following might impact your decision to take advantage of the lower price and purchase the material for the office Select all that apply. The best surface detail reproduction results were obtained using the Monophase polyether material (90% acceptable impressions), with no significant differences (χ² = 3.86, p = 0.483) observed between the Monophase and the rest impression materials.Īll materials exhibited acceptable dimensional stability, well below the ANSI/ADA specification no.19 standard of ≤0.5% dimensional change. D Question 16 1 pts Your dental supplier has a discounted price for polyether impression material if purchased in quantity. The lowest dimensional change was recorded for the Monophase polyether material with a mean percent value of -0.03 ± 0.01% (p < 0.038). 3M Impregum F Polyether Impression Material Double Pack, 31712 Category: Impression Materials & Accessories / Polyether. polyvinyl siloxane, all of the following are elastic impression materials except one. The highest dimensional change was recorded for the vinyl polysiloxane impression material, with a mean percent value of -0.09 ± 0.02% (p < 0.001). Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like a dental impression material, which one of the following impression material is transformed from a sol to gel state when set a. Statistical differences were observed in the mean percent dimensional stability (F = 39, p < 0.001) of the tested impression materials. The data were analyzed using Welch's analysis of variance, Games-Howell Post-Hoc, and the Pearson's chi-square tests (α = 0.05). Dimensional accuracy and surface detail were evaluated 24 hours after making the impressions using a measuring microscope. Twenty impressions of this die were made for each material. One stainless steel die was fabricated according to the ANSI/ADA specification no.19 criteria. All impression materials were of a medium viscosity. The materials examined were: 3 different polyether impression materials, a vinyl polysiloxane impression material, and a vinyl polyether silicone impression material. 3M Impregum Penta Super Quick Medium Body Upgrade Kit 69404. 3M Express VPS Bite Registration Material, 6160J. To evaluate the dimensional stability and the detail reproduction of five current elastomeric impression materials in vitro. 3M Impregum Soft Quick Step Light Body, Polyether Impression Material, Cartridge Refill, 31767.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |