6/22/2023 0 Comments Photo reader androidLet me tell you that this is portrait shot which should highlight person with edge detection, blur out the background. "Īre you retarded? I'm seriously wondering. And about edge detection, any chinese toys weren't even a competitor of s23u. The color and detail of the t-shirt were so bad. You wrote"Everything was grainy and out of white balanced in vivo. You better check your eyes and see psychologist additionally. Do you also know that X90 Pro is not the flagship device of Vivo vs Samsung's S23 Ultra Flagship? Do you know there's another model x90 Pro Plus which has much better processor and camera modules? Meanwhile you compare X90 pro, it still beats your Samsung product? What a comment really!Ĭommenting on the other guy's vision problem. What a analysis that one! From that comment should we assume there's some other factors included in your analysis which are completely unrelated to the photography performance. You fanboy!įor the third you pasted the same links! :) And you're so biased that you still trash out the Vivo saying chinese phones are not consistent. There's much more detail captures by vivo and noise reduction handled very well. Where's the distinguishable detail there? Look under the dark areas of the roof. Samsung's shot simply the branches black, dark. Vivo keeps the exposure higher that leads to brighter photos but the the extra V2 chip manages with the noise reductions so well. There's much more detail available in Vivo's shot. Look at the end of the street, Samsung's shot literally blurry, didn't manage to capture any detail look at the fan of the AC. Meanwhile with Samsung the there's issue that it got soft in the edges and it tries to save it by applying extra sharpening. Let's take the left side of the building. I see much better details in Vivo's shot. As you claim Vivo is blurry, actually Samsung's shot is over sharpened. Your eyes probably mixes what is over sharpened. In the first photo you mentioned: Vivo has much better performance. Anonymous, "The out-of-focus area on the main camera photos looks. He can be reached at To support local news, subscribe to The Stockton Record at. Record photographer Clifford Oto has photographed Stockton and San Joaquin County for over 38 years. A new challenge assignment will be issued on May 23. Tom LaBounty wins an 11”x14” print for second, and the third place prize of an 8”x10” print goes to Fred Norman.Īll of the photos can be seen in an online gallery at. As the saying goes, luck favors the prepared, and while the bee was unplanned, Engleman captured images that are more than just a simple blossom.įor being first, Janet Baniewich wins a free 16”x20” print of her choice made by UlmerPhoto in Stockton and a $25 gift card to a local eatery. He moved in close, and as he was framing his Sony A6400 digital mirrorless camera to capture a single flower, a bee buzzed in, looking for some nectar. While walking through the Lodi Lake nature area, he spotted some blossoming wild blackberry vines. Engelman’s husband, Paul Engelman’s flower photo, was enhanced with serendipity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |